PEN America v. Escambia County School District

PEN America v. Escambia County School District

Updated October 9, 2024

In May 2023, PEN America, Penguin Random House, and a diverse group of authors joined with parents and students in Escambia County, Florida, to file a federal lawsuit challenging removals and restrictions of books from school libraries that violate their rights to free speech and equal protection under the law.

This lawsuit brings together authors whose books have been removed or restricted and parents and students in the district who cannot access the books, in a groundbreaking challenge to unlawful censorship.

Ensuring that students have access to books on a wide range of topics and a diversity of viewpoints, a core function of public education — preparing students to be thoughtful and engaged citizens.

The lawsuit says the Escambia County School District violated the First Amendment rights of the students, authors, and publishers by removing books during the 2022-2023 school year  “based on ideological objections to their contents or disagreement with their messages or themes.” The books targeted for removal disproportionately addressed themes and messages related to race and LGBTQ+ identity. As documented by PEN America, Florida continues to have one of the highest rates of book removals and restrictions in the country.

In January 2024, Judge T. Kent Wetherell of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida heard oral arguments on the school district’s motion to dismiss. In an order from the bench, Judge Wetherell denied the school district’s motion to dismiss on the First Amendment claims, finding standing for all plaintiffs and rejecting the school district’s argument that the book removals constituted government speech not subject to First Amendment scrutiny. The court dismissed plaintiffs’ equal protection claims.

In October 2024, PEN America and other plaintiffs filed a motion to amend the complaint to challenge the school district’s policy implementing HB 1069. This was based on information learned in the discovery process, which revealed that the school board was continuing to keep books subject to a HB 1069 review off shelves, with no reasonable timeline for review. The amended complaint seeks a reasonable and timely review process for all books subject to objection and review. 

The discovery process also revealed that 24 previously-restricted books had been returned to the shelves in response to pressure from this lawsuit and other litigation throughout the state. Books by two authors who were original plaintiffs in the suit, David Levithan and Sarah S. Brannen, were among those returned to shelves, as well as one title by children’s author Kyle Lukoff (another of his books remains restricted). Books by other author plaintiffs in the suit, George M. Johnson and Ashley Hope Pérez, remain restricted.


If you’d like to help PEN America document and fight book bans, support our work today.


FAQ

What claims does the lawsuit allege?

What does the judge’s January order on the motion to dismiss mean?

Why is Judge Wetherell’s opinion important?

How does HB 1069 affect this lawsuit?

Why are authors plaintiffs in the lawsuit?

Why is PEN America a plaintiff?

Why is Penguin Random House a plaintiff?

Why Escambia County?

What does PEN America hope the outcome will be?


Meet the Author Plaintiffs

Ashley Hope Pérez

David Levithan

Kyle Lukoff

Sarah S. Brannen

George M Johnson